Daily Parse | Greenland’s premier narrowly avoids a no-confidence vote
Greenland’s political watchers will have noted that it was only fitting that it was Aleqa Hammond, an outspoken former premier, who did the honours when the time came to let Kim Kielsen (above, at rostrum) the current premier, off the hook. (For now, at least.)
Mr Kielsen was Ms Hammond’s lieutenant when she, in 2014, was forced out as premier and leader of Siumut, Greenland’s dominant political party. Wildly popular even when in bad political standing, she later threw her support behind Mr Kielsen when the time came to pick a new party leader; he has led the party and the country ever since.
Mr Kielsen’s term as premier has never been pretty – coalitions, including one that included Siumut’s arch rival, have come and gone; dissent within Siumut smoulders constantly – but, since July, the premier has been dogged by allegations of conflict of interest that, on Thursday, culminated in a motion in Inatsisartut, the national assembly, to hold a vote of no confidence against him.
Mr Kielsen, who, in 2018, failed to give a clear answer in an official statement about whether he still holds a commercial hunting and fishing licence, found himself facing allegations of conflict of interest earlier this year when it emerged that he rented a fishing boat to a close friend just two weeks before the national assembly voted this spring, amidst heated debate, to raise the amount of lumpfish roe fishermen could land this year.
The opposition, which brought the situation to light, believes Mr Kielsen should have excused himself from the deliberations, or at least made his fellow lawmakers aware of his side dealings.
The vote never came to pass. Ms Hammond, who has since switched parties, took to the rostrum to assure the assembly that Mr Kielsen had the votes of a majority of legislators.
“It is not time for an election,” she told the assembly. But, with continued uncertainty about whether the premier did, indeed, act in his own interest, the case is not closed entirely.
This, in part, is due to concerns that the first of two investigations into the matter may have come to the conclusion that Naalakkersuisut, the administration, wanted it to. A second investigation, this one conducted by Inatsisartut and delivered on 7 September, criticised the first investigation for being ordered by Naalakkersuisut. It also noted that the administration had not granted Inatsisartut investigators access to all of the documentation relating to the matter, including the administration’s instructions to the solicitor conducting the investigation.
The move to quash the no-confidence vote passed by a 14-13 margin; the missing votes included two legislators who were not present and two abstentions, both by Siumut legislators, who said their support for the premier hinged on the contents of the documents.
Ms Hammond recommended that the premier would be wise to address the deficiency, but, in the same breath, she made it clear that Mr Kielsen’s allies would not let him down.
“A majority still has confidence in the premier, and they are committed to finding a way to resolve the legal dispute between Inatsisartut and Naalakkersuisut,” she said.
It appears this this could be one fish Inatsisartut will have to watch get away.
- Greenland’s premier becomes embroiled in a row over roe
- For Greenland’s premier, two reasons to be relieved
The Arctic Journal
The Daily Parse offers a summary and analysis of the main points about a current topic related to the Arctic. Each article includes external articles and resources to give readers a place to begin if they would like to learn more.
Other internet bits and bobs, including Tweets and videos, are occasionally included.
As a way to encourage discussion about topics, briefings will also seek to include opinionated commentary submitted by outside writers.
Submit a commentary or suggest a topic for a future briefing by e-mailing email@example.com.
Get full-length articles delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe to The Rasmussen’s newsletter.